Who is Andrew Kuan? With the Presidential Elections expected in Aug this year, I was expecting another 'no contest' as President S R Nathan looks set for another shoo-in election following the lack of eligible candidates in the last round. Frankly, I am looking forward to having a new president after Mr Nathan's 6-year term. Having him for 1 term is more than enough for me. I have nothing against Mr Nathan, but what I would like to see in a president, is more active interest in performing his role as a 'auditor-in-chief' of our reserves. Afterall, the reserves are all taxed from the hardearned money from you and me. I do not want a president who has an acrimonious relationship with the government, when our energies should focus on how to ensure that Singapore survives well in this highly competitive global economic environment. However, the president should ensure that our government spend the money wisely. Currently, I have not read how Mr Nathan has exercised his power with regards to the above. For all I know, he might have been checking the books on those days he's not meeting students or charitable organisations. So, if you have done something Mr President, now is a good time for all Singaporeans to judge your credibility as the guardian of our reserves. Having said that, I would like to turn my attention on an interesting guy, called Andrew Kuan. I have to admit that Kuan is an anomaly in Singapore's rather staid political environment. I am not sure what possessed him to throw his name into the hat for this election. If what was reported in the papers is true, that he saw this as a service to the nation, then I applaud him for his dedication to serve the country. Kuan has definitely made the upcoming election more lively and interesting. However, I doubt he would make much of an inroad against Mr Nathan, given the simple fact that the incumbent has his face plastered all over the media for the last 6 years. The intensity of Mr Nathan's presence on the media has actually increased with the release of the polling date. Playing catch up with limited resources is almost impossible. For me, this election will be a formality. Kuan will get all the protest votes, from those who do not want to support the government-endorsed candidate. This brings in another interesting perspective. The timing of this election is perfect to judge voters sentiments to the government. As the president is nothing but a figure head with limited executive powers, the results of the upcoming poll could provide a good gauge of the level of 'non-support' for the government. Typically, kiasu Singaporeans are likely to vote in droves against the incumbent to show that they are not all happy with the rapid pace of globalisation and economic hardships suffered in the last 10 or so years. So, the Presidential Elections is a good time to vent their emotions, in a safe way. My gut feel is that we could see Kuan garnering around 30% of the votes, not too bad for a first-timer, but definitely not enough to derailed Mr Nathan's quest for a second term. As the whole of Singapore gears up for the election, negative media reports on Kuan's past is starting to appear on our trusty national paper, The Straits Times. Already disadvantaged by the fact that Singaporeans are seeing him for the first time in so many weeks, such reports are likely to take the wind out of his campaign. Thus, it looks like another shoo-in this year. Anyway, I just want to say 'Mr Kuan, thanks for making life a teeny weeny bit more interesting in Singapore. You are a refreshing change from certain political personalities that I know of. All the best'. Those interested in learning more about Andrew Kuan can visit his website here.
mydaemon
8/10/2005 09:13:00 am
I totally agree with your point about the Prez Elections being a good place to gauge the "level of non-support", as you so succinctly put it. You know, there's this 4th mysterious nominee. My mum was so funny yesterday. She said it might be LKY! Haha. Her basis was that the govt might be so worried about the protest votes going to AK that they put in a super-heavyweight to balance the power. Well, interesting thought, but I really think that's highly unlikely. Other speculations include our CJ and Winston Choo...
Hmm. We'll see on 17 Aug. :)
mydaemon
8/10/2005 10:54:00 am
Anyway I had a closer look at that photo of AK. First time I'm seeing his face. Now I know what you mean when you say he looks slimy. Yeah man.
Teddy
8/10/2005 09:14:00 pm
Yup, he has a face that I will not trust with my money. As for your mum's comments, I doubt the government would play off one of their guys with another. That'd be a rather weird strategy.
naniecheng
8/10/2005 10:34:00 pm
I really appreciate your point about the president's role as a 'auditor-in-chief' of our reserves. Come to think of it, Mr Nathan does not seem to have done this, at least not publicly. All he has done is show that he has a charitable spirit. Singapore doesn't need a President to be its charity mascot. A President must do much more. Plus he's so old. Pardon my disrespect but he has already lived past the average male lifespan in Singapore (80 yrs old).
Sigh but I'll be out of country on election day. Darn. Would have loved to cast my vote in a show of non-support to the government.
Teddy
8/10/2005 11:14:00 pm
Aiyoh, what a pity! It is not often that one gets to vote in Singapore.
Currently, I am not sure who I will vote for. While I think that the current president has not done much in the areas which he should be focusing on, the fact stands that he has done nothing wrong either.
As my earlier comments go, I will not want to vote for Andrew Kuan either.
So, it's a tough call... since I like neither candidate.
Ur Sweet Lullaby
8/10/2005 11:28:00 pm
Well, at least we can vote this year. I was afraid that it'll be another walk-over (zzz...thats just so boring and sad...- no holiday!!!) Yes, I agree with you that the President should do much more than being just a charity mascot. So far, I have not seen Mr Nathan having more contributions than that. Personally, after Wee Kim Wee, I have no attachments to the presidents after him.
Teddy
8/12/2005 08:57:00 am
I liked Wee Kim Wee and Ong Teng Cheong. The latter tried to exercise his powers. But in the end he got no answers.
I am glad to have the opportunity just to go to a poll centre cos I am sure my GRC will go uncontested again for the general elections.
Teddy
8/14/2005 09:46:00 pm
Anyway, Andrew Kuan had just "bite the dust." So, no holiday on 27 Aug. Sigh... 10 yrs since I turned 21, and I am still waiting for my first vote.